{"id":8174,"date":"2015-12-02T19:13:16","date_gmt":"2015-12-02T19:13:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/?p=8174"},"modified":"2018-04-14T14:35:52","modified_gmt":"2018-04-14T14:35:52","slug":"lifebuoys-could-be-worse-than-useless","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/lifebuoys-could-be-worse-than-useless\/","title":{"rendered":"Lifebuoys could be worse than useless"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>8:55 Tuesday 2nd December 2015<br \/>\nBBC Radio Cambridgeshire<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> But we&#8217;re going to talk first about these missing lfe-rings from alongside the River Cam in Cambridge. They were replaced only last week. They&#8217;ve now gone missing again. It&#8217;s been all over social media among the local Twitterati. So what happens next? Let&#8217;s speak to the River Manager Jed Ramsey from the Cam Conservators. What do you make of this then Jed?<br \/>\n<strong>JED RAMSEY:<\/strong> Going missing? It happens all the time. I think it&#8217;s a good reason to not have them there at all. That would be my view on that one.<br \/>\n<strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> Do you not need them there though for safety reasons?<br \/>\n<!--more--><strong>JED RAMSEY:<\/strong> I don&#8217;t think so. I&#8217;ve worked on rivers for twenty years, and I&#8217;ve never heard of anyone being saved by them. Also I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve ever picked one up. They&#8217;re like solid thick heavy plastic, and if you threw one of those at someone who was in the river from the height of where they are at riverside. I think there&#8217;d be a good chance you&#8217;d knock them out.<br \/>\n<strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> So why are they there in the first place, if you kind of think they&#8217;re pretty useless?<br \/>\n<strong>JED RAMSEY:<\/strong> Well I think they were put in when the bridge or the wall was built over a decade ago. Just probably somebody doing a risk assessment at the time said oh it&#8217;s a river. You&#8217;ve got to have lifebuoys. But I don&#8217;t necessarily think they&#8217;re always .. always a good thing to have. And it depends on the location. This location I think they should probably just remove them completely.<br \/>\n<strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> Would you have something there instead?<br \/>\n<strong>JED RAMSEY:<\/strong> No I don&#8217;t think so. I don&#8217;t think you need it. The river is quite narrow, and it&#8217;s also really shallow at the edges. So ..<br \/>\n<strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> Yes but I mean we all know Jed that if somebody gets into difficulties in water, sometimes it doesn&#8217;t matter how shallow it is.<br \/>\n<strong>JED RAMSEY:<\/strong> Yes that&#8217;s true. But it&#8217;s also hugely busy along there. There&#8217;s a constant stream of people. There&#8217;s people living in boats along there. There&#8217;s people rowing in boats. I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a high risk area for someone to drown. I think it&#8217;s a low risk area, so I don&#8217;t think life buoys are particularly helpful there. But that&#8217;s just my view obviously. Someone could do the risk assessment differently and did in the past. So it&#8217;s a subjective thing, isn&#8217;t it?<br \/>\n<strong>DOTTY MCLEOD:<\/strong> Mmm. Jed, really interesting to talk to you this morning. Maybe that&#8217;s something we&#8217;ll look into a little bit more,. I wonder if there are other rivers where you do have those life-rings and they are used and they are worthwhile. I wonder if other safety measures have been used in some parts of the world. Interesting.<\/p>\n<p>=======<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>8:55 Tuesday 2nd December 2015 BBC Radio Cambridgeshire DOTTY MCLEOD: But we&#8217;re going to talk first about these missing lfe-rings from alongside the River Cam in Cambridge. They were replaced only last week. They&#8217;ve now gone missing again. It&#8217;s been all over social media among the local Twitterati. So what happens next? Let&#8217;s speak to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/lifebuoys-could-be-worse-than-useless\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Lifebuoys could be worse than useless&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[260,182],"tags":[815],"class_list":["post-8174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bbc-radio-cambridgeshire","category-interviews","tag-cam-conservators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8174"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8722,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8174\/revisions\/8722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newlistener.co.uk\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}