<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The New Listener</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home</link>
	<description>News stories and interviews heard in the BBC Peterborough Breakfast Show.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Holdich on Primary School Places by Ed Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-primary-schools-full/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1741#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Peterborough’s Conservative Council has axed new primary schools for children even though the Conservative Councillors have already received the funding. 

I have contacted the Conservative Cabinet member at Peterborough Council directly, demanding to know which primary schools have been cut and when and where the children will get the additional places that are urgently required. He replied promptly to say he would not know more about West Town when council officrs are back from holiday and I could remind him about this in September.

 We had been assured that new primary schools plans such as West Town would not be affected by any change in government as the Peterborough City Council had already banked the funding required and provided by the Labour government. Indeed expectations were that a new school would be opened to take the additional pupils and growth in the population.  However council officer have explained that primary school building plans for the Peterborough constituency area are now in jeopardy and no contracts are being undertaken to replace overcrowded victorian schools.

I reckon the council budget is in a mess and they are also scared of spending anything on capital before the governments spending cuts are decided. Peterborough has already had its migrant impact funds cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peterborough’s Conservative Council has axed new primary schools for children even though the Conservative Councillors have already received the funding. </p>
<p>I have contacted the Conservative Cabinet member at Peterborough Council directly, demanding to know which primary schools have been cut and when and where the children will get the additional places that are urgently required. He replied promptly to say he would not know more about West Town when council officrs are back from holiday and I could remind him about this in September.</p>
<p> We had been assured that new primary schools plans such as West Town would not be affected by any change in government as the Peterborough City Council had already banked the funding required and provided by the Labour government. Indeed expectations were that a new school would be opened to take the additional pupils and growth in the population.  However council officer have explained that primary school building plans for the Peterborough constituency area are now in jeopardy and no contracts are being undertaken to replace overcrowded victorian schools.</p>
<p>I reckon the council budget is in a mess and they are also scared of spending anything on capital before the governments spending cuts are decided. Peterborough has already had its migrant impact funds cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Holdich on Primary School Places by Maggie Magennis</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-primary-schools-full/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Magennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1741#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Really understanding the growth and development of a new community is very difficult - for example, Cambridgeshire&#039;s projections for schools at Cambourne were rapidly outstripped too.   The populations of new areas are quite different from those of settled areas - we all know how young families move in, there is less known about who moves on, and who stays and grows older.   And then there is also the situation of under-used school places in estates where the children have grown.. and opposition to freeing up resources by closure. 
Cambridgeshire has taken a lead on such demographic work and Peterborough has accessed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really understanding the growth and development of a new community is very difficult &#8211; for example, Cambridgeshire&#8217;s projections for schools at Cambourne were rapidly outstripped too.   The populations of new areas are quite different from those of settled areas &#8211; we all know how young families move in, there is less known about who moves on, and who stays and grows older.   And then there is also the situation of under-used school places in estates where the children have grown.. and opposition to freeing up resources by closure.<br />
Cambridgeshire has taken a lead on such demographic work and Peterborough has accessed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Director of Communications by Kevin Roddis</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-council-director-communications/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Roddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1652#comment-352</guid>
		<description>&quot;more efficiently and effectively, delivering cost savings.&quot;

Excellent Matthew. Now make sure that we are not misinformed and tell us exactly how this will be measured. What will be the baseline? What will be measured to prove the case? What savings will be made? In what time frame will they be made?
Or will you just not say so that when someone queries the communications costs in a year as compared with last year you will just reply that they are misinformed.

Come on Matthew inform us all up front exactly what the savings will be and how we can measure them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;more efficiently and effectively, delivering cost savings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent Matthew. Now make sure that we are not misinformed and tell us exactly how this will be measured. What will be the baseline? What will be measured to prove the case? What savings will be made? In what time frame will they be made?<br />
Or will you just not say so that when someone queries the communications costs in a year as compared with last year you will just reply that they are misinformed.</p>
<p>Come on Matthew inform us all up front exactly what the savings will be and how we can measure them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horses For Hay by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-council-members-allowances/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1618#comment-351</guid>
		<description>I think with this council there is no expectation that they have any wish to part with any information that might be of use to anyone thinking of holding them to account. That&#039;s an entrenched attitude. They are so far away from having an open attitude that no amount of squeezing the pips will suffice. Only a complete clearout of the present Cabinet would do, or a commitment from them to begin to learn to trust. If they don&#039;t trust the electorate then there must be a reason why they want to keep information to themselves.

In the end they have provided the information, assuming the information given is correct as of today. Obviously they have presented it in a way that makes it difficult to decipher and forty days late. They could have presented it in a clearer way as requested with minimal effort. The will to oblige the requester is not there. In that circumstance I think it wouldn&#039;t be worth the effort to struggle with them in that way. There should be other ways to skin the cat.

And apparently when the reshuffle was made then both the ET and the BBC Local had sight of the simple list of new Members and Responsibilities. Neither of them published that information as-is, just publishing snippets and soundbites. They both chose to keep that full list to themselves. Secrecy is everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think with this council there is no expectation that they have any wish to part with any information that might be of use to anyone thinking of holding them to account. That&#8217;s an entrenched attitude. They are so far away from having an open attitude that no amount of squeezing the pips will suffice. Only a complete clearout of the present Cabinet would do, or a commitment from them to begin to learn to trust. If they don&#8217;t trust the electorate then there must be a reason why they want to keep information to themselves.</p>
<p>In the end they have provided the information, assuming the information given is correct as of today. Obviously they have presented it in a way that makes it difficult to decipher and forty days late. They could have presented it in a clearer way as requested with minimal effort. The will to oblige the requester is not there. In that circumstance I think it wouldn&#8217;t be worth the effort to struggle with them in that way. There should be other ways to skin the cat.</p>
<p>And apparently when the reshuffle was made then both the ET and the BBC Local had sight of the simple list of new Members and Responsibilities. Neither of them published that information as-is, just publishing snippets and soundbites. They both chose to keep that full list to themselves. Secrecy is everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horses For Hay by Kevin Roddis</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-council-members-allowances/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Roddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1618#comment-350</guid>
		<description>My point though admin is that the request is for up to date data. If today&#039;s data is published tomorrow then it is not up to date which is what was requested hence the only way that the council can apply the ruling where up to date data is requested is to publish immediately. if it doesn&#039;t then the reason given is not a legitimate reason under FOI since what they intend to publish is not the request, up to date data - if you see what I mean. I hope that their ruling is challenged by the requester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point though admin is that the request is for up to date data. If today&#8217;s data is published tomorrow then it is not up to date which is what was requested hence the only way that the council can apply the ruling where up to date data is requested is to publish immediately. if it doesn&#8217;t then the reason given is not a legitimate reason under FOI since what they intend to publish is not the request, up to date data &#8211; if you see what I mean. I hope that their ruling is challenged by the requester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horses For Hay by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-council-members-allowances/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1618#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Exactly Kevin. They claim to publish info openly but in fact they publish historical data. The rotters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Kevin. They claim to publish info openly but in fact they publish historical data. The rotters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horses For Hay by Kevin Roddis</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/peterborough-council-members-allowances/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Roddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1618#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Strictly speaking what was requested was &quot;an up-to-date list of Members’ Allowances&quot; if the current information is to be published at a later date it will not be up to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly speaking what was requested was &#8220;an up-to-date list of Members’ Allowances&#8221; if the current information is to be published at a later date it will not be up to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ferry Meadows as a Concert Venue by James</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/ferry-meadows-concert-venue/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1476#comment-336</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for trying to get people to spend more of their time like this, instead of in the shops.

However, I feel this is going to harm the park and these events should be on the embankment or at the Showground.

Even though we use Ferry Meadows every day, we were told we don&#039;t get a say because we don&#039;t live next to it.

I think there are some financial aspects that the Trust aren&#039;t telling us.
Their accounts seem to suggest they didn&#039;t do well with investments when the changed their funding from rents.
I think all this is a crazy way of getting more funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for trying to get people to spend more of their time like this, instead of in the shops.</p>
<p>However, I feel this is going to harm the park and these events should be on the embankment or at the Showground.</p>
<p>Even though we use Ferry Meadows every day, we were told we don&#8217;t get a say because we don&#8217;t live next to it.</p>
<p>I think there are some financial aspects that the Trust aren&#8217;t telling us.<br />
Their accounts seem to suggest they didn&#8217;t do well with investments when the changed their funding from rents.<br />
I think all this is a crazy way of getting more funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Destruction of Wildlife Habitats by James</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/destruction-wildlife-habitats/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1483#comment-335</guid>
		<description>In my opinion they&#039;ve done it so the litter blows onto homes and businesses and it&#039;s no longer their problem. Before the shrubs were full of litter.

It&#039;s totally bizarre that they rip up roundabouts and plant all new plants every year, but other areas are left ugly shrubs.

The council need to plant fruit trees and bushes in common areas.

The only justification for replaceing with grass is the very small areas at junctions where overgrown shrubs obscured the view and it was dangerous.

Also, slip road on/off the parkway are also dangerous due to poorlt managed planting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion they&#8217;ve done it so the litter blows onto homes and businesses and it&#8217;s no longer their problem. Before the shrubs were full of litter.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s totally bizarre that they rip up roundabouts and plant all new plants every year, but other areas are left ugly shrubs.</p>
<p>The council need to plant fruit trees and bushes in common areas.</p>
<p>The only justification for replaceing with grass is the very small areas at junctions where overgrown shrubs obscured the view and it was dangerous.</p>
<p>Also, slip road on/off the parkway are also dangerous due to poorlt managed planting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plenty of Water in Peterborough by James</title>
		<link>http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/anglian-water-plenty-water-peterborough/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/?p=1486#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Sound advice from Anglian Water.
However, only 67% on meters is frankly very poor.

It certainly isn&#039;t OK to use hoses to water plants.
This is totally inefficient, and actually helps spread plant diseases.
Water should be directed to the roots with a watering can.
Burying a bottle/pipe next to large plants/trees or using a mound/trough to stop water running away also helps.

Yes we&#039;ve water, but it still takes energy and money to treat and distribute it.
It&#039;s not a free resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sound advice from Anglian Water.<br />
However, only 67% on meters is frankly very poor.</p>
<p>It certainly isn&#8217;t OK to use hoses to water plants.<br />
This is totally inefficient, and actually helps spread plant diseases.<br />
Water should be directed to the roots with a watering can.<br />
Burying a bottle/pipe next to large plants/trees or using a mound/trough to stop water running away also helps.</p>
<p>Yes we&#8217;ve water, but it still takes energy and money to treat and distribute it.<br />
It&#8217;s not a free resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.404 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-03 16:17:51 -->
